Sunday, March 9, 2014
Universality
If Pythagoras had not lived, or if his work had been destroyed, someone else eventually would have discovered the same Pythagorean theorem. Moreover, this theorem means the same thing to everyone today as it meant 2,500 years ago, and will mean the same thing to everyone a thousand years from now — no matter what advances occur in technology or what new evidence emerges. Mathematical knowledge is unlike any other knowledge. Its truths are objective, necessary and timeless. What kinds of things are mathematical entities and theorems, that they are knowable in this way? Do they exist somewhere, a set of immaterial objects in the enchanted gardens of the Platonic world, waiting to be discovered? Or are they mere creations of the human mind?This question has divided thinkers for centuries. It seems spooky to suggest that mathematical entities actually exist in and of themselves. But if math is only a product of the human imagination, how do we all end up agreeing on exactly the same math? Some might argue that mathematical entities are like chess pieces, elaborate fictions in a game invented by humans. But unlike chess, mathematics is indispensable to scientific theories describing our universe. Another interesting part of this whole conundrum is that a lot of the computer science, technology, and communication services that we use now is based off of the math. If the math that is "universal" can be used then what of the things that it is used for?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have not really thought about the computers and communication services being something that is built on universality. Does it mean then that computers are universal and would have been "discovered" sooner or later?
ReplyDeleteIs software development and mobile applications then universal? Does it really make a different to us whether they are or not?
ReplyDeleteJust because a tool is universal does not mean that what is created with it is also. This means that software development is as unique as the person that creates it.
ReplyDeleteThe software and communication services thrive on being individual. It is a good thing that there is so much flexibility.
ReplyDelete